On Friday 05 March 2004 4:53 pm, fkamp@comcast.net wrote:
HEY !!! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!
Look at the subject title.
That tells me it is either spam or pure B.S.
No, I have not seen it and I don't want to see it.
What I found irksome -- and inexplicable -- about the original posting was that it consisted of a link with no description of what was to be found at the end of the link. The actual article was fairly interesting -- about some evidence that Microsoft has been funneling funds to SCO in order to cause legal problems for Linux -- but I still felt put upon that I wasn't given any information that would tell me if I wanted to pursue the link. It is an antisocial practice to post links without any description of what they link to. Is there anyone here -- anyone at all -- who can offer even a shred of defense for the practice? Whether the subject is off-topic or not is a separate question. Paul Abrahams