Andrew Joakimsen a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Ken Schneider
wrote: Gerald Pfeifer pecked at the keyboard and wrote:
Not if it's rushed out the door to quickly. I would rather see a 9 month cycle.
I certainly agree. I think providing a quality distribution that has been thoroughly tested should be top priority. I've seen some rather odd issues in openSUSE... VNC issues (lol), PHP Issues, problems with header files creating the inability to compile software, etc, etc.
may be we could come on a more standard naming sheme: main number (10, 11...) for major release, every 18 onth (for example) secondary number (0, 1...) for minor changes, so 6 month should be enough but is this even possible? if a major release of an important part of Linux is done, opensuse will have to follow (kde, gnome)... jdd -- Jean-Daniel Dodin Président du CULTe www.culte.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org