Felix Miata wrote:
Dirk Gently wrote on 2014-09-24 00:45 (GMT-0400):
Sievert and Poettering ...
... i think they should be arrested and charged with vandalism.
And then shot in the kneecaps with a shotgun.
Or maybe not. http://ewontfix.com/14/ I understood and agreed with, toned down from your sentiment, but philsophically the same. I don't think the same about systemd so much any more after reading a few days ago this:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-September/023294.ht...
Wow... let's see... /etc/inittab replaced by config files with dozens to hundreds of indecipherable, undocumented lines for even the simplest initializations some weird mechanism which intercepts $ /etc/init.d/[someservicename] restart and somehow maps it to some random-looking "systemd" command.... so the /etc/init.d structure is still there, but nothing there is actually meaningful.... which then just confuses the fuck out of everything process 1, init, .. an extremely short program, so short that it NEVER needs to be updated (and also takes exteremely few CPU cycles), is replaced by systemd, some big huge executable, which is a CPU hog, and sometimes needs to be replaced.... thereby causing an IMMEDIATE NEED FOR A REBOOT. The link you gave is some moron trying to handwave away all of the problems that systemd introduces, while still not providing very good solutions to the problems that we had with SysVInit. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org