Ruben Safir wrote:
At least it's served to cut the verbosity.
NMo, it amounts to emotional blackmail by someone who starves for attention. It's like being in a bad marraige and after arguing for 2 months over something vital, you finally throw up your arms and say, fuck this, you are insane about this and I'm not arguing any more. You walk out of the kitchen into the livingroom and your partner ***follows you*** into the other room and shouts "Oh Yeah!!, well I'm not done yet and I have something to tell you!"
Hah
well... This is not news on mailing lists, and certainly is not news for the free software community. Once someone brands himself as a leftest radical, promotes his love of systemd based on those abussive positions, and pats himself on the back, then there is no reson to continue to talk to him. No amount of "This sucks because it centralizes everything, forces reeducation of every core linux system, and breaks nearly 15 years of personal labor and the combined efforts of thousands of individual coders over the last 30 yearsi etc etc" is going to matter to this bastard. He doesn't give a shit. And neither do the people who implimented this. They don't care about the things you value. They have their own agenda. Their agenda is to have a single wrapper on the OS with a single large code base that is difficult to maintain but which serves to control future development and use. You can slap a GPL3 on this and it just doesn't matter.
Only 15 years? Try 40.
This is too large of a price to pay for not having to chmod a/dev/ driver, to avoid lsmod and doing an su to mount device, alli of which, I'm not certain was a good die a to change in the first place. How secure can something be if it creates its own device just because someone pops something into the damn usb port?
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org