At 07:30 PM 14/05/2005, John Bailo wrote:
On Saturday 14 May 2005 01:19, mike wrote:
On Saturday 14 May 2005 08:42, John Bailo wrote:
After suffering for months with an ATI 9200 with Suse 9.2, based on recommendations, I went and got a GeForce 5200.
Gee, that's strange, my ati 9800 pro works flawlessly also. Wonder what YOUR problem was/is?
General statements such as yours seem like trolling.
Sorry, but I went from a dog Radeon 9200 to a stellar GeForce FX5200.
funny, my Gigabyte 9200 works without fail or problems running games on w98 on vmware on 9.2 even better than w98 raw. scsijon
Maybe the 9800 is better -- but I do some high end gaming, and it's like night and day...I would never recommend any ATI product to any Suse user after my experience.
The other thing is I would definitely always stick only to hardware on the Suse supported hardware database. I had a similar problem with an SB 24-bit Live! All those problems were solved went I bought a $13 CMI based card.
Mike
-- Powered by SuSE 9.3 Kernel 2.6.11 KDE 3.4.0 Kmail 1.8 For Mondo/Mindi backup support go to http://www.mikenjane.net/~mike 10:17am up 2 days 14:56, 4 users, load average: 2.14, 2.24, 2.26
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com