Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
On 05/19/2013 03:19 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Sat, 18 May 2013 17:59:56 +0200 Per Jessen
пишет: Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Sat, 18 May 2013 09:08:49 +0200 Per Jessen
пишет: > but I thought those interface names were just hilarious.
They are just as good sequence of characters as any other.
I beg to differ. They make me smile, whereas 'eth0' doesn't.
Well, this makes further discussion pointless.
You can continue to use eth0 further, it is easy to disable new naming scheme.
Yes, I know and I am grateful.
Disabling the new naming scheme is easy, but what we need is an option to revert to the previous openSUSE behaviour of having persistent net names:
No! will you maintain out-of-tree code thst can break anytime just tonplease a few users ?
Sure, it is my right in our socalled "do-ocracy". When it's only about a few users, it won't break very often. In any case, I estimate that maintaining what has sofar worked quite well will be a lot less effort than adapting everything else to this new naming scheme, in particular for the interim period until everything uses the new scheme (likely several years).
STOP, this illusion of choice is incredible dangerous and demands quite a bit of human resources.
STOP yourself, you're a community member just like myself, why are you concerned about "human resources" instead of the plight of our users? As for illusion of choice - Cristian, choice is exactly what we have. The less user-friendly we make openSUSE, the more likely it is that people will choose to go elsewhere. Theirs and our _choice_. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (12.2°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - free DNS hosting, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org