The Saturday 2004-08-21 at 14:16 +0200, Rikard Johnels wrote:
Autolearn triggers only above and below certain values, that is, when it is already absolutely sure it is spam or ham. 3.1 is doubtful for that purpose.
I was referring to the "autolearn=no"
Me too. It is correct. See this header of an email that was not detected as spam: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_80,BIZ_TLD autolearn=no version=2.63 and then see the header from your own email: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Your's triggers the autolearn as 'ham'. Now see this one that is clearly detected as spam: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.63 See? It doesn't trigger. Now, one that does trigger: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=34.1 required=5.0 tests=BANG_EXERCISE,BANG_GUARANTEE, BAYES_99,CLICK_BELOW_CAPS,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,GUARANTEED_STUFF,HTML_60_70, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_10,HTML_LINK_CLICK_CAPS,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE, HTML_MESSAGE,IMPOTENCE,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MONEY_BACK,NO_COST,PENIS_ENLARGE, PENIS_ENLARGE2 autolearn=spam version=2.63 Does this clarify my statement from yesterday? -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson