On 19/02/2021 20.05, Robert Hardy wrote:
On Friday, February 19, 2021 4:21:47 AM CST Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 19/02/2021 08.57, Robert Hardy wrote:
[...]
I then noticed about 600 packages still had an "x-lp151.x" sort of moniker-- zypper up took care of that.
Maybe. Run this query in a terminal (konsole):
rpm -q -a --queryformat "%{INSTALLTIME}\t%{INSTALLTIME:day} \ %{BUILDTIME:day} %-30{NAME}\t%15{VERSION}-%-7{RELEASE}\t%{arch} \ %25{VENDOR}%25{PACKAGER} == %{DISTRIBUTION} %{DISTTAG}\n" \
| sort | cut --fields="2-" | tee rpmlist \ | egrep -v "openSUSE Leap 15\.2|openSUSE_Leap_15.2|\-lp152" | less -S
That will list /possible/ packages that were not upgraded, and you have to tend to them. Most will be GPG signatures.
I tried using susepaste for that, but I can't. It seems I am a spammer:
Yeah, it does that {chuckle smiley} Next time, instead of pasting from display, redirect to file and attach it. I can see that part of the line at the right side was lost.
Sun Oct 21 2018 Mon May 05 2014 gpg-pubkey 3dbdc284-53674dd4 (none)
These you can ignore.
Mon Jun 10 2019 Fri Mar 15 2019 libgsl23 2.4-lp151.4.1 x86_64 Mon Jun 10 2019 Mon Dec 17 2018 libgwenhywfar60 4.18.0-lp151.2.4 x86_64
I don't know what those two are, but you need updating them.
Wed Oct 23 2019 Tue Oct 22 2019 libfdk-aac1 0.1.6-lp151.2.2 x86_64 http://packman.li> Sun Mar 29 2020 Sat Mar 28 2020 libx264-155 0.155svn20190201-pm151.3.1 x86_64 http://packman.li> Sun Mar 29 2020 Wed Mar 18 2020 libx265-179 3.2.1-pm151.3.3 x86_64 http://packman.li> Sun Mar 29 2020 Sun Mar 29 2020 libx265-188 3.3-pm151.1.1 x86_64 http://packman.li>
These will probably show in red in YaST; in that case, remove them.
Sun Apr 12 2020 Tue Mar 31 2020 libicu60_2-ledata 60.2-lp151.3.11.1 noarch > Sun Apr 12 2020 Tue Mar 31 2020 libicu60_2 60.2-lp151.3.11.1 x86_64 > Fri Jun 05 2020 Thu Jun 04 2020 libgpac8 0.8.0-pm151.1.10 x86_64 http://packman.li> Sat Jul 11 2020 Fri Jul 10 2020 libx264-159 0.159+git20191127.1771b556-pm151.3.1 x86_64 http://pa> Mon Nov 02 2020 Sat Oct 31 2020 libx264-160 0.160+git20200702.cde9a933-pm151.1.2 x86_64 http://pa> Thu Dec 10 2020 Mon Dec 07 2020 libical2 2.0.0-lp151.3.3.1 x86_64 > Fri Dec 11 2020 Sun Dec 06 2020 gpg-pubkey d4d81407-5fcd2707 (none) > Thu Jan 21 2021 Mon Dec 17 2018 libhwloc5 1.11.8-lp151.2.3 x86_64 > Wed Feb 17 2021 Mon Feb 24 2020 libdvdcss2 1.4.2-1.3 x86_64 VideoLAN Project (http://>
All those, check if there is an upgrade; the libx[NUMBER] will have a library with a bigger number installed, so just remove them. libdvdcss2 is probably correct, just follows a different naming convention.
A quick look shows libgsl23 for example is an orphan, and can probably be safely deleted. All in all, it's no surprise packages were deleted. It's a bigger surprise some weren't.
Right :-)
In addition to pacman and debuginfo/debugsource repositories etc., I had only one, obs://build.opensuse.org/home:munix9 , from which I drew celestia. I would have expected that to be deleted, but no, it's fully up to date.
(on the other things, I can't comment. Except that you are not the only one to bump into akonadi)
Still running. Those draft message reports have disappeared. I notice kontact reports updating a new "Unified Mailboxes" folder, which is at 0% after two days runtime.
I don't know, I use Thunderbird. Fewer surprises. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.2 x86_64 at Telcontar)