-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Fred A. Miller wrote:
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 8:45 am, Pascal Bleser wrote:
Fred A. Miller wrote:
If anything could get me to go back to MickySoft, this IS it!!!! pro. photogs and graphic artists who use Linux are at a HUGE disadvantage because there's NO WAY in Gimp to get consistant ACCURATE color matching from the screen to paper, no matter what printer one uses!! This is a VITAL area that I've complained about before and it seems to fall on deaf ears. MickySoft just may be going to do something right for a change. Wow, I almost tagged this as spam... oh, wait... this *is* spam :)
NOT hardly!!!!! It's an area that has been ignored by the community, and
I meant your way of "writing" and expressing yourself in e-mails. Looks like some p3n15 enlargement mail. I wonder why my dspam didn't flush it down the spam toilet rightaway. Must have whitelisted the openSUSE ML sender.
really can't anylonger unless no one cares about pro. photogs. and graphic artists. If you don't, then I guess you can stick your head in a bucket and go one with what ever it is you do.
http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi/hacking/krita/cmm.html
Sure, some developers should care about photographs and graphic artists.
But Linux won't fade away in front of windows wixa just because of that.
What have you been smoking these days ?
And instead of shouting around on the openSUSE mailing-list (which is quite off-topic here.. this
isn't a gimp or krita mailing-list) that doom and wrath shall come over Linux because neither gimp
or krita have color profile management, you could actually /do/ something about it, like
- - discussing (I mean discussing, not shouting) about it with gimp or krita developers or on a gimp
or krita mailing-list
- - sponsor some gimp or krita developer(s) to have it implemented instead of spending many bucks on
Photoshop or Windows licenses
cheers
- --
-o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
/\\