Sure. There is every argument for it. "Purists" claim that Debian is the I agree we have a need for a standard, what I don't like is the idea that only
On 19-Aug-98 Ted Harding wrote: people who pay for the privalage get to decide what that standard is...
I believe the Linux Standard Base System Project is the protegee of one distribution, not a Linux-wide project. In fact, the only 100 per cent It was actually the brain child of Bruce Perens, Erik Wathenstein and joined by many other "big names" in the Linux worlds (such as Allan Cox, SuSE and Caldera). The only notable absentees were Red Hat and Debian.
---------------------------------- <A HREF="http://benham.net/index.html"><A HREF="http://benham.net/index.html</A">http://benham.net/index.html -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++ E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------------------------- - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e