On 2023-01-23 21:06, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Carlos E. R. <> [01-23-23 14:55]:
On 2023-01-23 20:51, David T-G wrote:
Paka, et al --
...and then Patrick Shanahan said... % * Carlos E. R. <> [01-23-23 06:36]: % > % > Patrick is using Mutt, which is ancient software, and I am using ... % % please define "ancient software". yes, mutt is > 27 years of age but my % last update: Build Date : Mon 05 Dec 2022 12:06:19 PM EST % ie: it is constantly improving. [snip]
+1 ... or maybe +10 or +100 :-)
UNIX is ancient, too; I'd put elm and PINE there. Linux is by now fairly long in the tooth, and I'd put mutt in that range. So, yeah, maybe ancient ... but *good*.
I didn't say otherwise... only that it is ancient ;-)
But it's support of PGP may not be working or may not exist. Similar to Alpine's.
that I cannot be bothered to configure mutt for gpg/pgp, is not an indication in any way that the ancient mutt cannot handle it. it says that I DO NOT CARE. for the most part, I find it a waste of resources.
Fine, but then do not complain when we use PGP and your Mutt displays garbage. That's not our problem, it is yours. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.4 x86_64 at Telcontar)