On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:24:15 +0000 Dave Howorth <dave@howorth.org.uk> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:03:46 +0000 Dave Howorth <dave@howorth.org.uk> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:51:27 +0100 Bengt Gördén <bengan@bag.org> wrote:
On 2020-11-25 13:34, Carlos E. R. wrote:
new "skin"
There seems to be some references to themes in the code.
Especially here. https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/-/blob/master/doc/conf.py
And of course in the css files. https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty/-/tree/master/hyperkitty/static/hyperk...
For those that don't like the default, dig in and make a pull request.
That's assuming hyperkitty's problems can be fixed by (re)skinning the cat. :)
I think most people have opinions more like mine which is that hyperkitty is gross, over the top nonsense.
marc seems reasonable https://marc.info/?l=opensuse&m=160631326501425&w=2
and so does nabble but it seems to be some years out of date :( http://opensuse.14.x6.nabble.com/openSUSE-community-f2987756.html
Here's another couple of possible candidates:
the Mail Archive seems to already index some opensuse lists, so could presumably be subscribed to this list and the support list as well:
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=all&q=opensuse&e=listname https://www.mail-archive.com/opensuse-commit@opensuse.org/msg212380.html
W3C has a mail archive system that is available, based on hypermail (which was written in 1994 but still has some activity and is under GPL on github)
https://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Devel/
I don't know what opinions others have about whether these possibilities are better than hyperkitty, or even just valuable as an additional alternative?
Has anything further happened with regard to alternatives to hyperkitty? I just had to use the archives this morning and found them dreadful to use. The biggest problem is the way hyperkitty replaces quouted material with dots. It makes it impossible to skim down a thread and understand what's going on.