Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 17:58:20 -0600 From: Gary <medmanks@mindspring.com> Message-ID: <20001127175820.A1274@linux.local> Subject: Re: [SLE] Balsa, mahogany, kmail.... On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:15:15AM +0100 or thereabouts, Roy G. Culley wrote:
Doesn't anyone else use nmh+exmh+procmail? exmh may not be the prettiest of MUA's but it does just about everything and is very configurable. In fact as it is written in tcl/tk it is easy to hack around with the source.
I have used exmh in the past, and you are right, it is a class act, and very configurable indeed, including citations. It will do just about anything, although I found their PGP/GPG to be a bit old fashioned, in the way they handle it, as really PGP 2.x and 5 are covered, but not 6.x, if I remember. . I have not set it up in a long time, but with the patches and version 2.2, it is really good - a long learning curve for the initiated though. It also supports good maintenence of MH directories, i.e. packing, ,and features and is well supported. -- Best regards, Gary