1 Jun
2004
1 Jun
'04
08:07
St. Maurice School wrote:
I toyed with the idea of running thin clients and terminal server, but decided against it because if the point of failure is the server itself, everyone is out of business, while if each loads the os then a point of failure, on the server, will still allow clients to do "Some Things"
comments, disagreements? I am open to thoughts/ridicule
IMHO, that's a good idea. But to ensure that the server is up most of the time, I'd recommend you to set it up as a cluster. HTH, Martin