Is it really a single point of failure. :) Setup two servers with a heartbeat between them and a nas devices for the data storage. Then if a server dies have the other one take its place. I use www.ltsp.org at home and for a couple of clients and it is great. On Tuesday 01 June 2004 04:07 am, Martin Mielke wrote:

St. Maurice School wrote:

...

I toyed with the idea of running thin clients and terminal server, but decided against it because if the point of failure is the server itself, everyone is out of business, while if each loads the os then a point of failure, on the server, will still allow clients to do "Some Things"

comments, disagreements? I am open to thoughts/ridicule

IMHO, that's a good idea. But to ensure that the server is up most of the time, I'd recommend you to set it up as a cluster.

HTH, Martin

-- Regards, Jason Kurtz Comptia A+ Cisco Certified Network Associate Linux Professional Institute Certified Level-1 Microsoft Certified System Engineer Microsoft Certified System Administrator Microsoft Certified Database Administrator NOGUSKA 741 N. Countyline Fostoria OH 44830 419-435-0404 CELL 567-278-CALJ FAX 419-435-1844 WWW.NOGUSKA.COM WWW.FOSTORIA.ORG WWW.NOLA-PRO.COM WWW.NOLAPRO.COM jkurtz@noguska.com Blessed are the geeks for they shall internet the earth.