On 07/23/2016 08:52 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2016-07-23 13:26, Anton Aylward wrote:
On 07/22/2016 04:55 PM, Anton Aylward wrote:
I categorize how many "*" there are 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 ... the degree of spam-ness. Some of the some false positives in the [10,20] and some of the [45,50] deserve black listing. Either way, it has, in the past, let me better tune the ratings.
Does anyone else do ratings / categorization by means of the 'score'?
Score? No, how do you do that?
Right now I do it by having multiple stanzas that count the number of asterisks: * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\** { LOG="SPAMSCOREYES 20SPAM " :0: $JUNKBOX/20SPAM } for 10, 20, 30, 40, 50+ There must be a better way. Perhaps # Drop spam over score 50. :0 * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=\/[0-9-]+ * ? test $MATCH -gt 50 $JUNKBOX/isSPAM But other than more step and repeat, I can't see how to minimise that. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org