Well, I find that procedure too complex. One of the reasons I refuse to use btrfs. too complex for a low occurence event?, compared to what in the rest of linux ecosystem?
The OP mentions having to use a Debian live image instead. see comment regarding argon and krypton.
comparisons to ext thus far seem to be on the scope of ext etc, not on the extra features of btrfs. ext will always be easier to use. btrfs can never win based on the metrics you assume. placed into to *context* of cost vs benefits, i would be extremly surprised if the cost of root/update screwups etc is not greater than problems with btrfs to the typical user. btrfs itself and opensuse defaults have improved rapidly this year. not sure anecdotal review and pointing to a minor problem with recent quotas is enough to condem the system. facebook dont seem to think so. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org