---- Ken Schneider - openSUSE <suse-list3@bout-tyme.net> wrote:
It's not. In fact, isn't kate the editor for kdevelop? My point, which I guess I didn't make very well, was that since there is no current fully wsywig html editor, I've found that manual editing, with snippets from the standard maintainers to reduce the dreary long repetitive strings, makes html building easy. Just flipping back and forth between Firefox and kdevelop is as easy as any current dedicated html builder that I found. And I like actually seeing what I'm doing.
jp
Have you looked at the composer part of seamonkey?
Actually, no. I seem to recall there were several real fans, and several real haters. I guess I should take a look, but the project that prompted my search is now done, and I don't have anything else in mind. This was a personal project -- all my professional stuff is in C/C++ and documentation. Depending on the interest my family shows in this past one (travelog of a long trip in my MR-2), I may do something of the sort again in the near future. But the idea of a huge mishmash to replace in one lump all of FF, TB, and Quanta seemed too much for me to deal with. Is Seamonkey's html editing really good enough to justify turning my back on the others? jp -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org