Is 9.1 able to write to NT File Systems? I don't think 9.0 can. Also if you have Windows 95, why not use it? It's fast and works well, though of course not as stable as 98 onward. I don't see any reason not to be able to restore the boot loader, by booting your SuSE with the boot CD, and then telling Yast to restore the boot. I have done that on SuSE 7.3. I'm old fashion and use Lilo though. ---Jim On Monday 07 June 2004 01:11, you wrote:
Why are you still interested in win95 when there are better,more scalable alternatives?I think you could do better with 2000 or xp. Paul.
-----Original Message----- From: Lucky Leavell [mailto:susemisc@UniXpress.com] Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 4:23 PM To: [SLE] Subject: [SLE] Dual Booting Win95/9.1
I know I should install Win95 first, then SuSE BUT, due to conditions beyond my control, all I could do was leave a 2Gb partition empty for future Win95 instllation. I went ahead and installed SuSE 9.1 using the Grub boot manager.
When I install Win95, it will replace Grub, right?
Question: Can I just restore Grub and have dual boot capabilities back or must I start over? It would also be nice to be able to mount the FAT32 parttion in 9.1.
Thank you, Lucky Leavell