On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 07:51:29AM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
David C. Rankin wrote:
On 12/10/2018 07:47 AM, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
Hmmm ... seems to miss e.g. UTF-8 support and some more I had added in past let's if I get this ported and also upstream but this will take a while I guess
Werner
You can see how it is packaged for Arch at:
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packag...
After using both over the years, I finally ended up with a problem heirloom-mailx couldn't solve while s-nail made it trivial.
(what raised the issue was answering a question on SO, e.g.) Unable to get output in table format through shell https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53693563/unable-to-get-output-in-table-f...
Slightly off-topic - I use mailx for many small notifications of this and that, all plain text, probably all ascii. If I want more than plain text, I format the entire email body myself and send it with "sendmail -oi ".
Yep, perfect for you. nevertheless in past I had a lot of customers/users which want to have a working mime detection and some things more. So I have a bunch of patches which if required I'd like to see in a potential s-nail baseds mailx: mailx-12.5-ipv6.dif mailx-12.5-mime.dif mailx-12.5-openssl-1.1.0f.patch mailx-12.5-parentheses.dif mailx-12.5-replyto.patch mailx-12.5.dif mailx-fix-openssl.patch nail-11.25-path.dif nail-11.25-toaddr.dif nail-11.25-ttychar.dif from server:mail/mailx ... also it seems not clear on which version of heirloom mailx the s-nail is based as there seems no usage of wordexp.h from glibc anymore. -- "Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr