On 20/09/17 08:39 AM, Daniel Bauer wrote:
But I think linux is also for just "normal" users who simply decide whether they prefer windows, mac or linux and who, maybe, like the open source approach for many reasons but cannot take part in it's development. I believe these people are valuable users, too, and while their contribution is not actively testing or developing, at least they help spread the idea and increase the popularity of linux.
While I see that Carlos really knows a lot and helps a lot, others, like me, must just trust on the knowledge and responsibility of the people who make the distribution we use.
I would only change to a new file system, or system at all, if there is not much noise on mailing lists about that. About btrfs there is still a lot. I confess, that I do not understand the details, but the fact, that there is a lot of noise is enough for me to make me refuse the use of it until the occurrence of related problems calms down to a normal amount of obviously solvable things.
This would be the moment when I personally consider a file system "not being dangerous" anymore.
By that criteria ReiserFS is great. It is one of the FS that is both actively used but enver, until now, disucussed file systems. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org