Op zaterdag 15 juli 2017 00:02:05 CEST schreef Brian K. White:
On 7/14/2017 4:48 PM, Knurpht - Gertjan Lettink vv wrote:
Op vrijdag 14 juli 2017 22:22:18 CEST schreef Brian K. White:
On 7/14/2017 3:34 PM, Anton Aylward wrote:
On 14/07/17 03:11 PM, Knurpht - Gertjan Lettink wrote:
Furthermore I'd like to state I'm not a friend of Lennart, never met him actually, but that I do dislike the bashing of him. IMHO he's one of the FOSS people that have dared to step up and do something. Which, IMNSHO deserves respect.
Indeed.
In one of the classic texts on logical circuit design, so fundamental that its idea are probably embedded in every design tool and now taken for granted in the> profession, is a quotation from the Roman poet Homer. In translation it
reads:
Brother, if you have a better idea, propose it freely. If not, make use of mine.
Or, idiomatically: Put up or shut up.
Its easy being a critic. Contributing something that is effective, lasting, easy to understand and maintain, and extensible is quite another matter.
Uh, the better idea had already been proposed, and it proved itself for decades. Nothing about systemd improves upon it.
systemd is like saying you think you invented a better way to do accounting. All that best-practices stuff they taught everyone for decades, so old and obsolete, we have a better way where we don't have to do all that annoying double entry stuff. Oh ok. Got it.
-- bkw
Yep. And KDE3 is the only desktop. And kernel 2.6 is the best ever made.
You have that exactly backwards. A useful tool does not demand that you use kde3, OR kde5.
It does not even demand or care one whit if you use any desktop at all. What a perfectly illustrative assumption you make by even saying "kde3".
There is nothing about init that prevents you from using any desktop, or from developing it to new different ones. This new vs old fixation is what's idiotic. Assumptions are what's wrong. Assumptions always need to be as few and necessary as possible. The old init makes *fewer* assumptions, and inflicts no demands upon how the higher level applications do things. It allows you to replace kde3 with kde5 or kde18 without caring at all. It is systemd which creates incompatibility out of thin air for no justifiable reason. There is no feature which systemd provides, which had to be implemented the way systemd does it, requiring the exclusion of, and breaking the function of any and all other methods of system set-up.
You say you have heard it all before, but how does that change any of the facts? And if you've heard it all before, then really that's just embarrassing for you, since it means you can no longer claim ignorance to excuse or explain your lack of understanding.
Let me ask another question: What is so magic about this decision that makes it so unassailable? The init system can only change once in the history of time? It can change from init to systemd, but that was it, now it can only be systemd until the heat-death of the universe?
You make ludicrous arguments based only on other ludicrous arguments.
No. Just saying that things move on. If someone had found a way to make sysvinit meet with modern requirements ..... And systemd will have a successor as well. It's what we do, create/improve things. My reference to KDE3 was just a joke. -- Gertjan Lettink, a.k.a. Knurpht openSUSE Board Member openSUSE Forums Team -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org