I screwed up references ...Sorry here it is again :) Because I am relative new in Linux world i don't understand few things. I know there are many Linux distributions. I don't understand why if we talk about "serious" Linux distro, conversation always ends with Red Hat or sometimes Debian. I keep hearing all the time words like "SuSE nice desktop system", SuSE cool "Win OS", "Windows like" Linux" etc ... I used SuSE 6.0,Red Hat 6.0. Now I am running SuSE 6.3 . I was searching distribution which is the best for me. Now I know it's SuSE . I hate cynic comments "a VERY user friendly distro" from Deb and Slack "power users" >:D . Isn't the point of Linux community to have user friendly OS and to show Linux to the people and not to stay OS for hackers, sys and net admins. And that is not going to happen if old gurus (with all respect from my side) keep making jokes with new users and new distribution. My question is: Do Red Hat or Debian have more pluses when we talk about stability and speed of server machines then SuSE? I don't like the way that Red Hat goes...it is exactly the same like MS few years ago... I found my favorite distribution and I am not going to change to another :) Thank you all for this valuable source of information ... Greetings, PaTLo ***First Linux on my machine was installed by WOMAN *** -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/