Linda Walsh wrote:
Anton Aylward wrote:
Linda Walsh said the following on 05/09/2013 12:28 AM:
Anton Aylward wrote:
Carlos E. R. said the following on 05/08/2013 08:13 PM:
You can even use several thunderbird versions each pulling from the same
But can either of you get Threadvis to work on your setup?
(https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/threadvis/) Yes, loads, runs, KER THUNK! [sound of lead ballon crashing?] I don't see that advantage over the threading I have and I don't see why I have to keep all the messages around - and on my workstation!
Wait -- are you saying you have to keep all the messages around on your workstation in order to get that to work?
I guess so....
Because in in 2.X, you only had to have the headers downloaded and threadvis could build it's index from that.
--- This was the part I was really interested in -- if it would run without needing all the messages downloaded locally as it did in the 2.x version. But from your response, I gather that it *doesn't* work without locally duplicating your entire IMAP store... That's a hefty cost.
As for advantages, when you look at the threading you already have, does it ignore mailbox boundaries and show you messages in the thread regardless of what mailbox they are in -- as that's what threadvis will do.
---- I'm surprised, I thought this would work -- but I guess your the threading you have doesn't automatically switch mailboxes when you click on a node on the thread-map? Having a threaded index that spans over 100 folders and auto switches to them that doesn't need the local message store seems like a significant advantage that one would give up in upgrading, no? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org