Am Sonntag, 11. Januar 2004 19:21 schrieb Heinz W. Pahlke:
Mit convert ist das prinzipiell auch kein Problem, bloss was ist sinnvoller: "convert -size 260x200", "convert -resize 260x200" oder "convert -scale 260x200".
Ich denke, scale reicht. Du willst ja quasi einfach nur kleiner machen, aber nix schnibbeln oder so. man ImageMagick (Optionen sind die gleichen wie bei convert): -scale <geometry> scale the image. See -geometry for details about the geometry specification. -scale uses a simpler, faster algorithm, and it ignores the -filter selection if the -filter option is present. Offsets, if present in the geometry string, are ignored, and the -gravity option has no effect. -resize <width>x<height>{%}{@}{!}{<}{>} resize an image This is an alias for the -geometry option and it behaves in the same manner. If the -filter option precedes the -resize option, the specified filter is used. There are some exceptions: When used as a composite option, -resize conveys the preferred size of the output image, while -geometry conveys the size and placement of the composite image within the main image. When used as a montage option, -resize conveys the preferred size of the montage, while -geometry conveys information about the tiles. Buenos dias Bernhard