On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:59:56PM +0100, Thomas Biege wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 05:43:49PM +0100, Malte Gell wrote:
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 13:00, Thomas Biege wrote: Hi,
We evaluated various solutions. The problem is that some are very intrusive and most can be bypassed.
We are aware of the fact that we *need* such a protection and are working hardly to get it done.
thanx, interesting answer ;-) I guess it suggests SSP isn't the best solution in your view, I've just read some positive things about it and this initially led to my question.
We didn't checked SSP AFAIK.
SSP is also called IBM Stackprotector after reading google again. We had a look at it, but the inclusion criteria for us is that is also included in upstream gcc. According to rumors IBM is working on that, but I doubt we will see that before gcc 4.1. Ciao, Marcus