24 Jun
2002
24 Jun
'02
03:06
On Saturday 22 June 2002 15:11, Ben Rosenberg wrote:
As I've said on the SLE and on this list...
"SuSE patches the version number that came with the distribution as to not break deps. It may be numbered the same as the "vunerable" version on the softwares site...but SuSE wouldn't make new pkgs with the same problems. This would be silly"
Ben, Yes, but I was comming from this perspective: _after_ SuSE released the "new" version, it was announced that32 bit architechtures were [potentially] exploitable too. I though, in effect, that this could be a "second" problem that wasn't dealt with in the former versions. Not that my method of thinking is worth anyting :-D JW