On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 01:48:04PM +0000, martin mcleod wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 03:38:11 -0500, Allen
wrote: On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:55:14PM -0900, John Andersen wrote:
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 01:24 am, Maarten wrote:
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 10:59, Riaz Ur Rahaman wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:20:33 +0530, Riaz Ur Rahaman
wrote:
> Hi, > I am not able to telnet to my system...I didnt have this problem > when I was running 9.1.... > > >telnet 215.176.125.70 > > Trying 215.176.125.70... > telnet: connect to address 215.176.125.70: Connection refused > > What configuration changes are required to be done in this case? If > the firewall is on, can i disable it completely or is there any way > of allowing my telnet session to happen?
Ehm...Let me get this straight. You're posting from a @hp.com address, to a security list, you mention two highly frowned upon items; "completely disabling firewall" and "enabling telnet" in you post *AND* you even put in the IP number of the target host...?!?!
You are either too stupid to work there, or you have some other agenda.
Maarten
Yes, trying to fiddle with a US DOD target at that. Good call Maarten.
OH MY GOD! Anyone ever read rinkworks computer stupidities? This should be there..... Shit like this makes me want to think about a Dell.
No offense @HP, but I worked flipping burgers in fast food because I'm "underqualified" because I can't afford to take the test and get my stuff from it, but THIS dude can work for HP?? OK, I'm pissed. I wouldn't be so pissed if I wasn't in need of a job so bad, but when you see things like this you just cringe.
You idiot, make sure you have the Telent server installed, and then edit the firewall with YAST2 and tell it to allow telnet.... Telnet is clear text, but after seeing this crap, I don't think you'll be able to comprehend why SSH is better anyway.
Heh, I doubt this guy will be back asking this question, or playing with THAT server again. ;)