On 2011-03-31 21:13:48 +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
* Marcus Rueckert
[Mar 31. 2011 20:52]: On 2011-03-31 20:45:31 +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
Klaus (who updated rubygems 2 times during the last 24 hrs ;-) )
except that those hashvalue to big changes are actually a bug in the old ruby package and not rubygems. *sigh*
Yeah, and ruby didn't really care. (http://revision-zero.org/history-of-a-bug)
given it was fixed between p174 and p248 i wouldnt call it "didnt care" so the real solution would be to find the changeset that fixed it between those 2 patchlevels and then apply it to our ruby packages on the older distros. wouldnt you agree? darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux openSUSE is good for you www.opensuse.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-ruby+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-ruby+help@opensuse.org