On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:18:13 +0100
Klaus Kaempf <kkaempf(a)suse.de> wrote:
* Martin Vidner <mvidner(a)suse.cz> [Jan 22.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:23:25PM +0100, Klaus
> I'd like to generate the following packages for Ruby 2.1
> 1. ruby-2.1
> This would provide binaries (ruby, irb, rake, gem, ...) and a
> minimal set of documentation (changelog, readme, news, ...)
> 2. libruby2
> This would only provide the libruby2.1.so.2.0.0 shared library
> 3. ruby-stdlib
> This would provide the /usr/lib64/ruby/2.1.0/ directory tree.
Which use case needs 1+2+3 separated?
Just for smaller maintenance updates.
I think it is not enough value to do it.