Hi, Am 27.08.20 um 13:54 schrieb Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar:
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 13:42 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
Am Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:44:58 -0400 schrieb Neal Gompa
: We still have a concept of a *default* Python version and things will just *work* that way? Do we plan to have one? If yes: who is maintaining the result of this decision?
Current failure in "openSUSE:Tumbleweed": have choice for python > 3.0: python36 python38 python39
I think this has to be handled in the prjconf of the base prj. Thanks for bringing that to my attention - it's kinda pecculiar that somebody would buildequire 'python > 3.0' - the package 'python' has always been '2.x' and python3 was for >= 3.0
The python singlespec macros actually should take care of the distinction between python and python3 [1]. Now with possibly different Python3 existing in parallel this will actually make more sense.
But I can 'de-prefer' python36 and python39 for this case.
Doesn't that contradict the idea of having coexisting python36, python38, etc.? Note that the Leap repositories in devel:languages:python:* including "backports" are already broken in this regard for days and nobody seems to care [2].
Cheers, Dominique
Regards, Ben [1] https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Python#Requires.2C_Provides_and_s... [2] https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1175777 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-python+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-python+owner@opensuse.org