16 Mar
2007
16 Mar
'07
7:56 p.m.
On 3/16/07, Christoph Thiel <cthiel(a)suse.de> wrote:
Hi everyone,
today we are releasing slightly changed openSUSE 10.2 ISO images. The reason
for putting out those updated ISOs is a license issue, which had to be
addressed. The following ISOs have be replaced on the mirrors:
Could you please explain what has changed. "We have released new isos
because of a licence issue" doesn't give any useful information.
- Which packages have been added/removed
- Which functionalities have been added/removed
_
Benjamin Weber
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
16 Mar
16 Mar
7:59 p.m.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 06:56:31PM +0000, Benji Weber wrote:
On 3/16/07, Christoph Thiel <cthiel(a)suse.de>
wrote:
None.
Hi everyone,
today we are releasing slightly changed openSUSE 10.2 ISO images. The
reason
for putting out those updated ISOs is a license issue, which had to be
addressed. The following ISOs have be replaced on the mirrors:
Could you please explain what has changed. "We have released new isos
because of a licence issue" doesn't give any useful information.
- Which packages have been added/removed - Which functionalities have been added/removed
None.
Best,
Christoph
--
Christoph Thiel, Tech. Project Management, Research & Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
8:41 p.m.
- Which
packages have been added/removed
None.
- Which functionalities have been added/removed
None. 
8:59 p.m.
"Bruce Smith" <blubdog(a)gmail.com> writes:
If we already have the old ISO's downloaded, is there any functional
reason to download and use the new ISO's from now on? (if so, what?)
None at all, there's no functional change.
- Which packages have been added/removed
None.
- Which functionalities have been added/removed
None. Can you be more specific on what was changed? i.e.
Was it just the
wording of a license?
It was a missing license - so we basically changed metadata.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj(a)suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
8:51 p.m.
- Which
packages have been added/removed
None.
- Which functionalities have been added/removed
None.
8:59 p.m.
"Benji Weber" <b.weber(a)warwick.ac.uk> writes:
/me breaks out md5sum and diff.
Hint: Look for agfa-fonts ;-)
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj(a)suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
- Which packages have been added/removed
None.
- Which functionalities have been added/removed
None. 
10:29 p.m.
On Sat 17 Mar 2007 08:59:46 NZDT +1300, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
I was asking myself all the same questions that have been asked here
too. Plus what's the least-bandwidth way to update the old ISOs to the
new?
Hint: Look for agfa-fonts ;-)
Ah, that one. I don't think I'll bother then ;)
Each time I run you on 10.2, it wants to install that font package
update. Each time I think that I don't want to be annoyed with another
popup (whatever the license is, it'll cover the home user), so each time
I select "never install".
Each time I run you on 10.2, ... (repeat above)
Either I don't understand the meaning of "never install" and the red
round icon with the white horizontal bar in it, or something isn't quite
right. Being overly self-confident I'd say the latter. I didn't find it
searching for it, but surely this couldn't be a not-yet-reported bug?
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
17 Mar
17 Mar
10:25 a.m.
Volker Kuhlmann <list0570(a)paradise.net.nz> writes:
Each time I run you on 10.2, it wants to install that
font package
update. Each time I think that I don't want to be annoyed with another
popup (whatever the license is, it'll cover the home user), so each time
I select "never install".
Each time I run you on 10.2, ... (repeat above)
Either I don't understand the meaning of "never install" and the red
round icon with the white horizontal bar in it, or something isn't quite
right. Being overly self-confident I'd say the latter. I didn't find it
searching for it, but surely this couldn't be a not-yet-reported bug?
Guess that everybody thinks this way - better report it ;-)
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj(a)suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
10:14 p.m.
On Sat 17 Mar 2007 22:25:21 NZDT +1300, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Guess that everybody thinks this way - better report
it ;-)
#255642
Probably everyone just clicked ok on this one, though it looks like it's
the tool of choice to prevent a buggy update from being installed.
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
19 Mar
19 Mar
11:51 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The Sunday 2007-03-18 at 09:14 +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Another one is that Yast does not always respect "protected" status and
wants to update a protected package if "he" has the same or better version
number, disregarding the protected status. Worse, next time it asks again,
has no memory nor manners.
#246928
I had to increase my compiled packages to version 900 to be left alone...
- --
Cheers,
Carlos E. R.
Guess that
everybody thinks this way - better report it ;-)
#255642
Probably everyone just clicked ok on this one, though it looks like it's
the tool of choice to prevent a buggy update from being installed. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFF/msotTMYHG2NR9URAnnkAKCKQSFWuW4z5FOydJx0YKH6qzWpMgCfT5Kp
cQchipDT+FchARuuDtf5qvA=
=BuPO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
21 Mar
21 Mar
9:27 p.m.
On Sun 18 Mar 2007 09:14:39 NZST +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
On Sat 17 Mar 2007 22:25:21 NZDT +1300, Andreas Jaeger
wrote:
The 11th duplicate of #164445, which is almost a year old and has
"enhancement" priority...
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org
Guess that everybody thinks this way - better
report it ;-)
#255642
22 Mar
22 Mar
9:16 a.m.
Volker Kuhlmann <list0570(a)paradise.net.nz> writes:
On Sun 18 Mar 2007 09:14:39 NZST +1200, Volker
Kuhlmann wrote:
I've added my comments there, thanks for pointing this out,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj(a)suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
On Sat 17 Mar 2007 22:25:21 NZDT +1300, Andreas
Jaeger wrote:
The 11th duplicate of #164445, which is almost a year old and has
"enhancement" priority... Guess that everybody thinks this way - better
report it ;-)
#255642
19 Mar
19 Mar
2:41 p.m.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 06:56:31PM +0000, Benji Weber wrote:
To clarify, here is what we should have said in the announcement (in short):
- No functional changes.
- Not even code changes.
- License texts of the "agfa-fonts" package were rectified.
- That's all.
For those of you, who would like to take a closer look, I'v attached the
gzipped diff from the original openSUSE-10.2-GM-Addon-NonOSS-BiArch.iso to
the current openSUSE-10.2-GM-Addon-NonOSS-BiArch.iso -- the diffs of the
other affected ISOs will look similar.
Thanks,
Christoph
--
Christoph Thiel, Tech. Project Management, Research & Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
today we are
releasing slightly changed openSUSE 10.2 ISO images. The
reason for putting out those updated ISOs is a license issue, which had
to be addressed. The following ISOs have be replaced on the mirrors:
Could you please explain what has changed. "We have released new isos
because of a licence issue" doesn't give any useful information.
- Which packages have been added/removed
- Which functionalities have been added/removed
5052
days inactive
5058
days old
12 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Andreas Jaeger -
Benji Weber -
Bruce Smith -
Carlos E. R. -
Christoph Thiel -
Volker Kuhlmann