[opensuse-project] Apache2 changed?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d66e/0d66e782e3d7d78f98e31959cfa88dab63c6270d" alt=""
Hey guys I was wondering, is it a bug or just the way it is that when we ask YaST to install AMP we no longer get the "It Works" page? Maybe we should think about a default "Welcome to openSUSE's implimentation of Apache2" page -- James Tremblay openSIS Product Specialist http://www.os4ed.com mail james "AT" os4ed.com CNE 3,4,5 MCSE w2k CLE in training Registered Linux user #440182 http://en.opensuse.org/education -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cc5b/2cc5b6ce9a6f8d5985829b5e21192c0ce525fef5" alt=""
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:49:30 -0500, James Tremblay aka SLEducator wrote:
Hey guys I was wondering, is it a bug or just the way it is that when we ask YaST to install AMP we no longer get the "It Works" page? Maybe we should think about a default "Welcome to openSUSE's implimentation of Apache2" page
Not sure about the openSUSE version you are observing this on, but the "it works" page lives in a separate package called apache2-example-pages since a long time, and usually you don't want to have this installed I guess because the contained index.html would kind of conflict with an index.html you would create yourself. I don't know if this example package is part of the "AMP" pattern - apparently not. You can check the Apache/apache2 package in OBS for details. Experience shows that a big "welcome" page leads to confusion, and a small "it works" page is the only thing that makes it reasonably clear to users that openSUSE didn't "invade their site". Which is why the Apache HTTP Server project has settled for a page like that. With RPM based software distribution there's always some remaining risk that users fiddle enough with the packages so they get their own index.html moved away to index.html.rpmsave or worse, if they decide to remove the example package, or similar. So I would recommend to not install such a file by means of an RPM package, if at all. Peter -- "WARNING: This bug is visible to non-employees. Please be respectful!" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Research & Development
participants (2)
-
James Tremblay aka SLEducator
-
Peter Poeml