Hello, On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 2010-06-24 11:18, David Haller wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Per Jessen wrote:
Sure, but that's not up for discussion. Are you saying that to a regular observer Linus' comment was not rude??
Have you read Linus' followups in that thread?
And anyway, lkml is not a pony-farm!
Conversely, opensuse is a pony farm?
opensuse-de is not. And definitely shouldn't be (and I'll take care of that, if I can and Henne lets me). A real discussion can, sometimes has to, be harsh. AFAI-read opensuse, it also is not. And also shouldn't be. Harsh words are neccessary at times. In Linus' position, I'd guess regularly, if not habitually. Consider yourself being "showered" with crappy code on a daily basis ... Could you always keep your temper? Wouldn't you prefer to "wake up" the "client" to think twice (e.g. go over the kernel "DEFAULT" settings) the next time _before_ submitting a patch? And _did_ you read Linus' followups in that thread? Your answer implies you have not. And BTW: do you passively read opensuse-de? Or -packaging? [-> PM on that?] -dnh PS: why the CC? We're both obviously subscribed to this ML... PPS: above is _not_ personal, I respect you. I think there's still some "*guru*" packages installed ;) -- Memory is like gasoline. You use it up when you are running. Of course you get it all back when you reboot... --Actual explanation obtained from the Micro$oft help desk. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org