The option was put there by an optimist, who believed that in the future the project would grow into something that people would want to help with. Clearly that hasn't been the case and I believe before we decide to kick out the existing board, we need to focus on fixing that. By electing the next board into the same set of rules, we would be asking to repeat this exact thing some of us think we are preventing with it, if we even got as far as having the next board.
This is a special situation. As far as I am aware we never had a no-confidence vote being considered yet. A serious series of events has taken place that in the end made me think and then go for it and bring it up for discussion. That does not mean that we aren't grown-ups that know that such a rule should only be used in serious cases and not be misused as an instrument to force re- elections just for fun or for minor things or because anyone things other were more suitable for a board position than those in place. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org