7 Sep
2018
7 Sep
'18
08:52
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 16:17 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Richard Brown <RBrownCCB@opensuse.org> [09-06-18 15:47]: > > On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 at 20:43, Per Jessen <per@computer.org> wrote: > > [...] > > > That is fair enough, I absolutely accept your position. Now > > > shall we > > > bring the proposal to a vote? I mean, let's finish the thread by > > > tabling a motion for the board to vote on. I am not sure if my > > > wording > > > is good enough, I would prefer if someone could help out. > > > > > > Yes, I would certainly like to know who voted what afterwards. :- > > > ) > > > > Answering your question with a question - why should this be > > something > > the Board decide on? should we instead consider this as a > > Membership > > vote? > > instead of volumous almost answers, do it and stop talking about it. > bring the matter to a vote. and probably the vote should be by the > Membership as it will define actions expected from those who that > same > Membership ultimately elects. > > asking for a close of debate and: > > I hereby move for a vote by the Membership to mandate a public record > of > the comitteemenbers vote for, against or abstention of, for $SUBJECT, > to > be included in the minutes. a reason for the particular vote would > be > welcome but not mandatory. note that private matters as those of a > particularly personal matter or of non-disclosure type would be > considered > outside this direction. > > call for seconds Stepping a bit late to this semi-ridiculous discussion but I disagree with both: * proposal itself to make votes part of public record * voting on this topic among openSUSE members seems unnecessary to me as well. Cheers Martin