Am 15/02/11 14:10, schrieb Henne Vogelsang:
Hi,
On 15.02.2011 12:44, jdd wrote:
Le 15/02/2011 12:07, Henne Vogelsang a écrit :
guys when are you going to realize that the 0,01% your are trying to solve are not worth all this effort? :)
free software world also give much value to such things (sometime too much IMHO)
That's why it's okay to talk about the licensing of the content on our web-pages. But it's rather pointless to talk about re-licensing of content aggregated on the planet or cited in the weekly newsletter...
Henne
+1 And I would guess in this thread are many aspects mixed together (outspoken and hidden; technical, social, historical, personal, legal). I know that probably all is connected and maybe one caused each other. But my idea would be that we would try to separate the problems a bit from each other (in different threads?). E.G: Against the fear/threat of being (with or without effort) sued for making the openSUSE Weekly News I would have those points in mind: - Asking the original authors - No full repetition of hole articles nor big parts of them - More indirect citing (telling in the own words) - ?Maybe a bit more concentration on issues of openSUSE? - Asking others what they think about the way that the openSUSE Weekly News are made. - Protection for the ones that give effort to the openSUSE community The least point is in my view at least worth a different thread. Maybe as an part of the (planned?) discussion about possible goals of the unborn openSUSE foundation/legal person for the community? Compare: Henne on http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Foundation with http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Foundation/Topics
By-laws
* Objective of the Foundation o Moderator: henne o Status : Topic is now open for mailing list discussions o Results :
Martin (pistazienfresser) -- - Martin Seidler - openSUSE profile: https://users.opensuse.org/show/pistazienfresser -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org