* Per Jessen <per@opensuse.org> [01-24-11 14:33]:
Perhaps, but that's not enough to form a base for punitive action, IMHO.
I see two ways out - we rephrase or amend the guiding principles and include something like: "As a member, you explicitly agree to ..."
Ahhhh. Agreeing to the "Guiding Principles" is not "explicit"? Agreeing is "Agreeing", there is no splitting hairs here!
Or we empower the board to act as umpire with arbitrary powers.
The does not need "arbitrary" powers, but *must* be empowered to enforce the standards/principles we attribute, lacking some other entity which to my knowledge has not been formed. Until the formation of *that* entity, the board is the only enabled/empowered agent/umpire we have.
I don't mind either one, but I do appreciate that not everyone might see option #2 as very attractive.
Without the existence of an "empowered" agent, we, openSUSE, are only words, ie: Guiding Principles. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org