* Per Jessen <per(a)opensuse.org> [01-24-11 14:33]:
Perhaps, but that's not enough to form a base for
punitive action, IMHO.
I see two ways out - we rephrase or amend the guiding principles and
include something like: "As a member, you explicitly agree to ..."
Ahhhh. Agreeing to the "Guiding Principles" is not "explicit"?
"Agreeing", there is no splitting hairs here!
Or we empower the board to act as umpire with
The does not need "arbitrary" powers, but *must* be empowered to enforce the
standards/principles we attribute, lacking some other entity which to my
knowledge has not been formed. Until the formation of *that* entity, the
board is the only enabled/empowered agent/umpire we have.
I don't mind either one, but I do appreciate that
not everyone might see
option #2 as very attractive.
Without the existence of an "empowered" agent, we, openSUSE, are only words,
ie: Guiding Principles.
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711
Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help(a)opensuse.org