On Fri, 2020-03-13 at 13:00 +0100, Pierre Böckmann wrote:
Throughout the weeks before the election and throughout the election weeks Sarah’s application and its wording and expressed opinion had at no point been ruled as violation of Guidelines or the Code of Conduct. There has even never been any discussion about it. If there would have been any evidence or indication of a violation those points should have been a topic and should have lead to ruling Sarah out of candidacy.
Snipping most of your reply because I refuse to allow this thread to decend into yet another nonsense flame by rebutting your endless counter rebuttals - consider my previous points to stand reinforced in disagreement with you. All I wish to point out is..what on earth gives you any idea that "Sarah's application and its wording and expressed opinion" had anything to do with the Code of Conduct violation? Speaking from my own experience as a previous Board member, the vast majority of Code of Conduct violations we had to mediate in my time occured within non-public discussions between individual contributors or groups of contributors. Given the Board's clarifications for their decision did not point to any public record, I would absolutely expect that their decision was based on incidents between contibutors outside such public records as Sarah's application. Is your entire Call for No-Confidence based on the likely flawed premise that the Board sanctioned someone because of something they said on the lists? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org