![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/c0c68c05edcca20697ca86abacd301b0.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, My 2c (and sorry for barging in, even though I'm a newbie). If it's clear that a) the contributors to wiki own the content under a specific license OR b) you have to ask them specifically for permission to relicense and c) can't ignore that you have to contact hundreds of people to get their consent ... I suggest using the same license. Except if there's a bottleneck you expect in which case I kindly ask you to elaborate. But otherwise, I really like what you're doing, took a look at GitHub you provided, looks great, modern, nicely structured. I'll see how I can help. -- Nenad Latinović nenad@latinovic.si
On 08/07/2021 12:48 PM Carlos E. R.
wrote: On 07/08/2021 08.58, Adrien Glauser wrote:
Dear Richard,
Thanks for your email. This is utterly offtopic but it's a good point I'll be pleased to talk with you about in private or publicly if you open a Git Issue or a new topic. I will not pursue this topic here.
Why offtopic? This is a matter of interest to any wiki contributor in the past.
How are you going to solve the issue of the licensing, is core to this migration. And as I see it, it is impossible to change the license of the texts, and you are bound to accept it.
-- Cheers / Saludos,
Carlos E. R.
(from oS Leap 15.2 x86_64 (Minas Tirith))