On 09.08.21 10:30, Richard Brown wrote:
MicroOS started life as a SUSE-sponsored direct contribution to openSUSE alongside SUSE's development of the SUSE CaaSP (and now SLE Micro) commercial projects.
My role as a contributor in this openSUSE side project was 'appointed' by the team/SUSE.
OK. And which openSUSE entity appointed you as release manager for MicroOS? And who decides about the scope of MicroOS? Not that I would challenge that appointment, as I could not be less interested in anything than MicroOS, but if it is "King Richards toy project", then just declare it as such. If it's not, though, then I'd suggest allowing others to also contribute is what openSUSE is about.
"Officially supported" means aligned with the goals of the contributors to MicroOS. This means (ideally all of the below):
who are the "contributors to MicroOS" in your opinion? If there are none who are not paid by SUSE, did you ever think about if this might be because of your bully attitude? -- Stefan Seyfried "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Richard Feynman