On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 20:12, Sarah Julia Kriesch <ada.lovelace@gmx.de> wrote:
And I think this community would have failed if it had not asked question when a board member steps down because of events within the board that are in conflict with his moral and principles.
And I think some people in this community failed as they did not respect the clearly stated wish of both former members not to tell the details. And that despite the repetition of this wish.
And that was Marina with the email by the Board!
Don't blame Marina, you know very well who you're really blaming. I'm here. If you want to make this personal, use my name. I am and was the one you're looking for. No. You were only the initiator. The decision was made without you. Pierre has figured out correctly the former Board Member because of the same conduct on our mailing lists as before [0] and why I have written my email to the openSUSE Board: "I can't help myself here but to say honestly and with all due respect: In the light of the words of Christians comment about the boards official announcement those last words from you are quite cynical, disrespectful, maybe even rude and disgusting. Sorry, that I have to say that in those clear words."
You and Richard have the worst public chemistry ;)
This guy has represented himself (with the company signature!) on the same way during the application period with speaking bad about the openSUSE Heroes Team [1], myself and others. He had interacted on the same way in the openSUSE Board in the past and is doing so on our mailing lists continuously. Does that match our Code of Conduct or do we have special rules for such people?
This is simply a critique of status quo, not the effort of the contributors. Richard even goes as far as to point out: "(...)it's not the Board's job to tell our infrastructure volunteers or sponsors how to do their job." I fail to understand how you can see this statement as disrespectful. It recognizes Heroes as trying their best.
Additionally, I did not say anything confidentional on Telegram, too. I said only that I had to resign. There is a difference between Telegram and archived mailing lists. The openSUSE Board did that alone and has stood for a worst-case management there. That is really vague without good arguments.
I disagree, not being on the board, we already got to know more of the story based on the Telegram messages than we would have known otherwise. This is your part of that discussion from 11.Feb, around 22:22 local time Ich musste im Board zurücktreten. Es hängt mit dem Vorfall mit Richard auf der Mailingliste zusammen. Ich hatte die Wahl zwischen Rücktritt und Rauswurf im nächsten Meeting So zeige ich öffentlich, dass es nicht mein Verhalten im Board war, was das Problem ist. Clearly, based on that, we could extrapolate way more of what happened than just what was on the ML (which was the goodbye email[1]). That's confidential no matter how you look at it (I guess, I don't read German ;)
Did you have a look into our Board list after the resignation of 2 Board Members? That is no surprise for the interrelated protection. In my point of view that is more difficult to find new Board Member candidates who want to work together with the existing Board than a re-election of all Board Members.
The more of your messages I read the more willing I am to step up. LCP [Stasiek] https://lcp.world [1] https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-project/2020-02/msg00025.html -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org