Dne středa 5. června 2019 16:11:57 CEST, Robert Schweikert napsal(a):
On Wednesday, 5 June 2019 15:03:59 CEST Robert Schweikert wrote:
On 6/5/19 8:29 AM, Richard Brown wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 14:19, Robert Schweikert
wrote: The discussion in this thread mostly focuses around control of the mark and why that may or more may not be important. Based on that it appears to me that the first question we need to answer for ourselves is if it is important to control the mark, and how important it is? And that is being discussed with arguments on either side of the topic. The rest follows from there. The original question, paraphrased, "change On 6/5/19 9:26 AM, Pierre Böckmann wrote: the name or not?" becomes superfluous once we agree, possibly vote on, whether complete control of the mark is something that we want or not.
To avoid situation similar after referendum in one well known state, before answering any such question, we must have very precise information. E.g what *exactly* does it mean in practice to have or not to have "complete control of the mark"? From my very limited perspective I don't see problems with the current state, so I don't feel need to change. I'm afraid all that financial and legal issues are far too much virtual for many people here. The question was raised with particular aims. If we agree on the aims, which options do we have to reach them? What does it mean practically? I know many points were repeatedly mentioned repeatedly in the discussion, but still, when preparing the vote, the question and accompanying materials will have to be prepared with big care. -- Vojtěch Zeisek Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/ https://trapa.cz/