On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 17:55, Christian Boltz <opensuse@cboltz.de> wrote:
Am Freitag, 20. März 2020, 19:55:29 CET schrieb Stasiek Michalski:
you are blocking the board from releasing their perspective.
Stasiek, I hope you realize that your statement is purely based on speculations (and maybe a problematic and questionable statement by Axel and Gertjan - see my mail yesterday for details about that).
Maybe(!) it's Sarah who doesn't want to have the minutes disclosed.
Maybe(!) it's $other_person or $group_of_persons who doesn't/don't want to have specific information published. In this case, your statement hurts and damages Sarah a lot.
Maybe(!) it's a combination of the above, and multiple people don't want to have everything in public. Maybe because they realized that they would look bad, maybe they simply don't want the public mud wrestling, maybe both.
Whichever of the above is true (no, I won't tell you ;-) [1] in the best interest of _all_ the involved people) - please stop these damaging speculations, and especially stop writing them in a way that makes them sound like facts!
I already told you yesterday that the directly involved persons have agreed not to disclose further details [2]. Part of that is not to publish who allowed or declined disclosing the meeting minutes (and the history that explains them) because mentioning that would already imply that the other side wants to "hide something".
Besides that, publishing more information would again be "from one perspective", obviously depending on who publishes it.
If you don't like all this, feel free to write to the board - maybe(!) they'll tell you if you were right or if you have to apologize.
I will start with an apology then, I'm sorry, because clearly the information that was presented on the mailing list wasn't sufficient to make this judgment call earlier. This does clear up some things. I was presenting info that I understood to be facts, but clearly, I do not have the full picture.
Any coin has two sides Sarah, one sided coin is impossible.
Maybe(!) this coin has even more than two sides?
If I was a smartass I would say it has 3 sides, because they are very short cylinders. Those cool japanese coins have 4 sides, because they are cylinders with a cylinder cut out from the middle. However, ever since the board split into as many pieces as it did, we are all getting tired trying to count these sides ;) LCP [Stasiek] https://lcp.world -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org