* Andreas Jaeger
On Thursday 08 July 2010 11:48:53 Guido Berhoerster wrote:
* Andreas Jaeger
[2010-07-08 10:55]: On Wednesday 30 June 2010 18:56:08 Stephan Kleine wrote:
[...] Merge this together with Martins "poweruser" proposal and the developer one and we have the best IMHO.
I've tried some merging with Martin's "poweruser" and Jan has updated the proposal:
http://en.opensuse.org/Documents/Strategy/Status_quo
We have never documented the Status Quo yet, so I think it's worth while to document that.
This was not intended as a _documentation_ of the status quo.
My goal was to create a documentation of the status quo - I would have added a third page but Jan merged it in his proposal, so let's go from there.
Although it does that as well, it primarily constitutes a _proposal for a strategy_ which aims to focus on and stick to
Guido, Jan calls it "Status quo" with a purpose.
existing strengths of the project while addressing some deficiencies. In fact it incorporates parts of the other proposals and should stand adjacent to them as an equal alternative.
It is called "Status Quo, and quantified so" and it is a proposal oritented towards the status quo, if you will, but it also contains additional elements. Anyway, it is a strategy proposal (as was Martins and even you call it so yourself above) and I'd like to be able to vote for it. -- Guido Berhoerster -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org