On 10/2/19 8:42 PM, Simon Lees wrote:
On 10/2/19 9:14 PM, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
On 01.10.19 22:20, Axel Braun wrote:
Am Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2019, 16:20:10 CEST
schrieb Henne Vogelsang:
As we are on the edge of a new era (legal structure/foundation) it
be the time to change the name - if the majority of members want this .
I understand that there is a timing issue involved here. However, there
is no need for rush right?
This is currently the biggest blocker to setting up the foundation, as
it dictates a significant amount of what our future negotiations with
Sorry, but from my perspective this is a perception issue.
Based on, if I remember the conversational points from the earlier
threads properly, circumstantial evidence from another project, The
Document Foundation and Libre Office, and possibly mixed with some
personal discomfort, it has been postulated that a name difference
between a foundation, a project, and a product/products is not advantageous.
However I would content that there is no hard data that substantiates a
significant advantage of the idea that things have to have the same name.
There is nothing really that would stop anyone from creating "The Green
Geeks Foundation" with a charter that contains:
"...This foundation is established for the sole purpose to support the
Then there is a legal entity that can receive money and based on the
charter it is known to any external entity/sponsor where the proceeds of
the foundation will be invested. This can be setup completely
independently, does not require a vote and would provide a legal entity.
The new legal entity can then undertake any negotiations that are deemed
necessary w.r.t. trademarks etc.
That the choice proposed to be presented for a vote is a convolution of
topics is a result of us not making the effort to pry things apart and
have clear communication about the individual levels/components of
things that are more or less tangentially related.
Having conversations about the individual parts can lead to decisions
"in a vacuum", which generally do not turn out all that well. However,
having conversations about the individual bits that are focused would
certainly help to create clarity.
One has to understand the individual pieces to put a puzzle together.
Based on this thread I would say I am not the only one that doesn't have
a clear understanding of all the moving parts and how they are supposed
to fit together. I did read all the messages in this thread and in the
earlier threads about the topic.
Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
Distinguished Architect LINUX
Technical Team Lead Public Cloud
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org