No, you would use no-confidence exactly in the situation when somebody else would be more suitable to be on board than the current board members. I don't think that's the case here, the current board acted according to the rules. If you want to approach it from the side that actually will change things, please ask the community for a rule change instead of a no-confidence.
I have to disagree here. Additionally I don't get why asking for a rule change might be more applicable than asking for a no-confidence vote. That would not in the least address the events that lead me to consider the no-confidence vote as the best option and reaction to what happened in the last few weeks. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org