Karsten König wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Juni 2010, 16:35:51 schrieb Per Jessen:
Karsten König wrote:
For Fedora and RedHat I think it's basicly the same as openSUSE to Novell about gained expertise, testbed etc. Still RedHat as a company seems more of a grey eminance and has a better reputation, I can't say if it is still justified, but I often have more trust in projects kicked off by RedHat engineers as their communication feels more open.
RedHat and Canonical both have the tremendous advantage of being Linux companies fair and square.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
SuSE still rings a bell? It is one of the first companies founded to sell a linux distribution and to create a business model around it, according to wikipedia more then 10 years before Canonical and even one year before RedHat.
Sure, but that identity is long gone and dead - unfortunately.
So SuSE is owned by Novell, now they aren't a Linux company anymore?
We have all been told that SuSE does not exist, is not an entity (except in the Handelsregister). However, openSUSE would be in a much better position if it was still SuSE Linux, IMHO. /Per Jessen, Zürich -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org