On 3/20/20 9:32 PM, jdd@dodin.org wrote:
Le 20/03/2020 à 11:34, Richard Brown a écrit :
Without a Board, that bridge would be gone.
of course, but I don't see why there should be no board. until now the candidates have always been sufficient
consider a Foundation are on hold as a result of Pierre's call for a No-Confidence Vote.
I guess a no-confidence vote have to be a new board vote...
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Board_election_rules#Removal has the rules in question.
very odd place, removal have nothing to do with elections :-(
Yep at some point the plan was to add the rules around what makes an openSUSE member here and just rename it as the project constitution but for now were waiting to see where the foundation goes to do that, but you can really think of it as the projects constitution minus what defines a member.
"other serious misconduct or negligence, a Board member may be subject to removal (...)
no mention here of "code of conduct". did the removed board member stole something or so?
One could argue that a repeated breach of the "guiding principles" / "code of conduct" could be classed as "Serious Misconduct" such an interpretation is consistent with employment law in many parts of the world for what its worth. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B